Skip to main content
Check and provide your planning data

BETA This is a new service – your feedback will help us to improve it.

Back to dataset table
East Hampshire District Council

Tree

There is a problem

  • 1000 entries with tree-preservation-order field must match the reference field in the tree preservation order

1393

reference
632-tree-1
name
1393
tree-preservation-order

undefined

632-tpo-1
uprn
address-text
point
POINT (-1.022798 50.880850)
geometry
MULTIPOLYGON (((-1.022727 50.880842,-1.022730 50.880856,-1.022740 50.880869,-1.022756 50.880879,-1.022775 50.880885,-1.022797 50.880888,-1.022819 50.880886,-1.022839 50.880879,-1.022855 50.880870,-1.022866 50.880857,-1.022869 50.880843,-1.022866 50.880829,-1.022856 50.880817,-1.022841 50.880807,-1.022821 50.880800,-1.022799 50.880798,-1.022777 50.880800,-1.022757 50.880806,-1.022741 50.880816,-1.022731 50.880828,-1.022727 50.880842)))
notes
felled-date
entry-date
2026-08-06
start-date
end-date

How to fix this issue

Your data is missing a tree-preservation-order.

The tree guidance explains how to fix the issue:

tree-preservation-order

The reference for the tree preservation order that affects this tree.

Example: TPO1

This diagram shows the relationship between the tree preservation order dataset and the tree dataset. The reference value from your tree preservation order dataset needs to match the tree-preservation-order value in your tree dataset.

How to improve East Hampshire District Council’s data

  1. Fix the errors indicated
  2. Use the check service to make sure the data meets the standard
  3. Publish the updated data on the endpoint URL